Hi. First of all, sorry if you don't understand something, english is not my native language.
I've been a Red Orchestra player since you developed the first Red Orchestra, when the saga was not as well known as today. I really enjoyed your game because I was tired of being Rambo in Call of Duty and Battlefield. I'm a big fan of belic games and the realism, and I know that COD or BF are not realist. Maybe those games have tons of kids playing, but the gamplay is not realistic, and the community is ****. In those games, you run in the battlefield like Rambo, you can be hitted by some shoots and still alive and still killing like Rambo. You can run, jump, and shooting in the same time, with crosshair. Well, I think than everybody who played CoD and BF knows what I mean.
Thats why I'm playing your games, the Red Orchestra/Rising Storm saga. Is realistic, and has nothing in common with CoD or BF.
When you released Red Orchestra 2, in 2010, at first I was very excited because I wanted more games like Red Orchestra 1 with better graphics and physics, but Do you remember guys how it was the release Red Orchestra 2? How it was RO2 at the beginning? Do you remember how they developed a game like Call of Duty with crosshair? I think that maybe they wanted to earn money like EA or Activision, and they though that introducing in their markets they will achieve that. The community of Red Orchestra was very dissapointed and everyone showed on the forums.
We were disappointed, because you have became a saga which differed from commercial games like COD or BF, in a clone of those games just to make money.
Luckily the community responded and sent you to hell (no offense). Then, you went back to the beginning, to Red Orchestra 1 gameplay, to the realistic gameplay, introducing realistic and even the classic mode (for the most radical who wanted the same experience as RO1). And the game was improved, the player base of Red Orchestra were back and everything was good and okay like today.
So I ask you, please, do not do the same strategy with Rising Storm 2. Do not do an arcade game. Do not do a game like COD or BF because you will fall into the same error, your loyal player base will leave, and the COD or BF players will play only until a new COD/BF will be released. After that, your game will be a fail like RO2 at the beginning.
So, do not do odd mix, simply follow the path of good, simply follow the same way as you did with the first Red Orchestra, and the correction of Red Orchestra 2 and Rising Storm. your player base may not be as big as COD or BF, you may not should gain as much money as EA or Activision, but you have one of the best war games, unique, different, realistic, it is like playing the WWII. And I want the same with Vietnam. Keep that because it's what best you have and what makes you so great.
If you preserve the true saga, if you follow this way, I always will buy your games.
Sincerely, a fan of the Red saga.
I've been a Red Orchestra player since you developed the first Red Orchestra, when the saga was not as well known as today. I really enjoyed your game because I was tired of being Rambo in Call of Duty and Battlefield. I'm a big fan of belic games and the realism, and I know that COD or BF are not realist. Maybe those games have tons of kids playing, but the gamplay is not realistic, and the community is ****. In those games, you run in the battlefield like Rambo, you can be hitted by some shoots and still alive and still killing like Rambo. You can run, jump, and shooting in the same time, with crosshair. Well, I think than everybody who played CoD and BF knows what I mean.
Thats why I'm playing your games, the Red Orchestra/Rising Storm saga. Is realistic, and has nothing in common with CoD or BF.
When you released Red Orchestra 2, in 2010, at first I was very excited because I wanted more games like Red Orchestra 1 with better graphics and physics, but Do you remember guys how it was the release Red Orchestra 2? How it was RO2 at the beginning? Do you remember how they developed a game like Call of Duty with crosshair? I think that maybe they wanted to earn money like EA or Activision, and they though that introducing in their markets they will achieve that. The community of Red Orchestra was very dissapointed and everyone showed on the forums.
We were disappointed, because you have became a saga which differed from commercial games like COD or BF, in a clone of those games just to make money.
Luckily the community responded and sent you to hell (no offense). Then, you went back to the beginning, to Red Orchestra 1 gameplay, to the realistic gameplay, introducing realistic and even the classic mode (for the most radical who wanted the same experience as RO1). And the game was improved, the player base of Red Orchestra were back and everything was good and okay like today.
So I ask you, please, do not do the same strategy with Rising Storm 2. Do not do an arcade game. Do not do a game like COD or BF because you will fall into the same error, your loyal player base will leave, and the COD or BF players will play only until a new COD/BF will be released. After that, your game will be a fail like RO2 at the beginning.
So, do not do odd mix, simply follow the path of good, simply follow the same way as you did with the first Red Orchestra, and the correction of Red Orchestra 2 and Rising Storm. your player base may not be as big as COD or BF, you may not should gain as much money as EA or Activision, but you have one of the best war games, unique, different, realistic, it is like playing the WWII. And I want the same with Vietnam. Keep that because it's what best you have and what makes you so great.
If you preserve the true saga, if you follow this way, I always will buy your games.
Sincerely, a fan of the Red saga.
Please Tripware, don't ruin this game as you did with RO2 at the beginning
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire